Well, personally......

Author: * Asenath Amenhotep - 5 Posts on this thread out of 2,321 Posts sitewide.
Date: Feb 19, 2004 - 04:16

I would prefer a more formal system.

The initial case could be in more simplified terms but then the rest should be formal.

For example:

Case: Was King Tut murdered?

The "prosecution" then presents his/her case (inc evidence) then the "defendant" presents his/her case (inc evidence).

Both then cross-examine and chance for rebuttal.

Judge then decides.
What does everyone else think?